Only want to make the archive from a small experiment. Not want to break that more research first, if there is a conflict with this. Because I am only trying to record a recall.
In this experiment, has been prepared 2 computer (real) with the Windows XP SP2 Operating System, IP 10.12.3.40 and 10.12.3.53, to conduct an experiment on the MAC and IP.
Inside the Computer 1 has been activated Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 with Windows XP SP2 Operating System (Computer 1a) and VMWare with the Linux Backtrack Operating System (computer 1b). Can be understood, that in this experiment, there are 4 computer that is ready for use.
Details of equipment:
Computers 1
MAC 00-0F-FE-95-0F-5F (G-Pro Computer)
IP 10.12.3.40
Computers 1a
MAC 00-03-FF-97-0F-5F (Connectix)
IP 10.12.3.39
Computer 1b
MAC 00-0C-29-F7-AE-A1 (VMware)
IP 10.12.3.38
Computers 2 (borrowed from Soni Firyadi)
MAC 00-0F-FE-95-12-7B (G-Pro Computer)
IP 10.12.3.53
1. MAC Computers 1a reconcile with the MAC computer 2, successfull.
Changing the ending of the IP 39 to 53, after the MAC on. Success, the connection does not interfere out, there is no conflict.
Computer 1a and computer 2, not experienced any disruption to the network, both for the local area network or intranet with a pass through the router.
2. Computer 1b use Backtrack with IP 38, IP reconcile with Computer 2 to 53, without equates the MAC.
Computer 1b success change to IP 38, without requiring the replacement of the MAC. Computer 2 while on the notification system appear error (IP Conflict)
Then, the MAC Computers 1b reconcile with Computer 2, which is the IP conflict.
After the same MAC, the Computers 2 and 1b same does not have a problem with the network connection.
3. MAC Computers 1a reconcile with the Computer 1 (parent), successfull.
IP Computers 1a (39) reconcile with the Computer 1 (40), there is no conflict. What is happening is not a conflict? Not fact.
Computer 1a have a problem with the network connection, although there is no message from Windows saying that the IP conflict occurs.
Computers 1a is not only not able to pass through the router, but also not able to pass through an Ethernet Card, which is owned by the Computer 1.
4. Computers 1b that use the IP 38, analogous to the Computer 1 (40). Computer 1b, streamlined access to existing web outside the office, while Windows is on the Computer 1 to give warning that the IP conflict. Computer 1 is not able to go everywhere.
MAC of computer 1b (40), reconcile with the MAC of computers 1 (40 - IP Conflict). Computer 1b, can still connect to the web outside the office, while Computer 1 still can not connect with other computers even though there is no conflict IP messages from Windows.
Ethernet Card on Computer 1, that use Windows XP SP2, can be penetrated even closed by Backtrack.
Hopefully with this little experiment here is archived here, I can continue to remember about this simple experiment and discard little bit stupid.
Re-written using the English language. First published by sapimoto with MAC vs IP title in February 22, 2008
In this experiment, has been prepared 2 computer (real) with the Windows XP SP2 Operating System, IP 10.12.3.40 and 10.12.3.53, to conduct an experiment on the MAC and IP.
Inside the Computer 1 has been activated Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 with Windows XP SP2 Operating System (Computer 1a) and VMWare with the Linux Backtrack Operating System (computer 1b). Can be understood, that in this experiment, there are 4 computer that is ready for use.
Details of equipment:
Computers 1
MAC 00-0F-FE-95-0F-5F (G-Pro Computer)
IP 10.12.3.40
Computers 1a
MAC 00-03-FF-97-0F-5F (Connectix)
IP 10.12.3.39
Computer 1b
MAC 00-0C-29-F7-AE-A1 (VMware)
IP 10.12.3.38
Computers 2 (borrowed from Soni Firyadi)
MAC 00-0F-FE-95-12-7B (G-Pro Computer)
IP 10.12.3.53
1. MAC Computers 1a reconcile with the MAC computer 2, successfull.
Changing the ending of the IP 39 to 53, after the MAC on. Success, the connection does not interfere out, there is no conflict.
Computer 1a and computer 2, not experienced any disruption to the network, both for the local area network or intranet with a pass through the router.
2. Computer 1b use Backtrack with IP 38, IP reconcile with Computer 2 to 53, without equates the MAC.
Computer 1b success change to IP 38, without requiring the replacement of the MAC. Computer 2 while on the notification system appear error (IP Conflict)
Then, the MAC Computers 1b reconcile with Computer 2, which is the IP conflict.
After the same MAC, the Computers 2 and 1b same does not have a problem with the network connection.
3. MAC Computers 1a reconcile with the Computer 1 (parent), successfull.
IP Computers 1a (39) reconcile with the Computer 1 (40), there is no conflict. What is happening is not a conflict? Not fact.
Computer 1a have a problem with the network connection, although there is no message from Windows saying that the IP conflict occurs.
Computers 1a is not only not able to pass through the router, but also not able to pass through an Ethernet Card, which is owned by the Computer 1.
4. Computers 1b that use the IP 38, analogous to the Computer 1 (40). Computer 1b, streamlined access to existing web outside the office, while Windows is on the Computer 1 to give warning that the IP conflict. Computer 1 is not able to go everywhere.
MAC of computer 1b (40), reconcile with the MAC of computers 1 (40 - IP Conflict). Computer 1b, can still connect to the web outside the office, while Computer 1 still can not connect with other computers even though there is no conflict IP messages from Windows.
Ethernet Card on Computer 1, that use Windows XP SP2, can be penetrated even closed by Backtrack.
Hopefully with this little experiment here is archived here, I can continue to remember about this simple experiment and discard little bit stupid.
Re-written using the English language. First published by sapimoto with MAC vs IP title in February 22, 2008
ga ngerti sama sekali :D
BalasHapusWah gak ngerti sama sekali saya bos.wkwkwk bahasa inggris saya dapat telor waktu sma
BalasHapus